The phrase,'Unsound Transit', was coined by the Wall Street Journal to describe Seattle where,"Light Rail Madness eats billions that could otherwise be devoted to truly efficient transportation technologies." The Puget Sound's traffic congestion is a growing cancer on the region's prosperity. This website, captures news and expert opinion about ways to address the crisis. This is not a blog, but a knowledge base, which collects the best articles and presents them in a searchable format. My goal is to arm residents with knowledge so they can champion fact-based, rather than emotional, solutions.

Transportation

Showing posts with label 2.12 Tacoma LR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2.12 Tacoma LR. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Pierce County will not support ST2 unless light rail goes to Tacoma

No light rail? Then we’re not buying tickets
THE NEWS TRIBUNE
Published: March 26th, 2008 01:00 AM
South Sound citizens had an understanding in 1996 when they voted to create a regional transit system that year. Seattle would get a light rail line first, then the service would be extended to Tacoma.

The thinking ran like this: The South Sound would support expensive rail construction through S eattle to Sea-Tac Airport. Later – with Seattle’s support – Sound Transit would support the extension of light rail through South King County to the Tacoma Dome Station.

That’s how we understood the deal, and we were paying very close attention.

Now it’s 2008. Seattle’s got its line; Sound Transit plans to open the first segment of it next year. But guess what? Somewhere along the way, some of the agency’s planners and leaders started losing interest in the airport-to-Tacoma connection.

Sound Transit has lately been working up a ballot measure that would drop that connection. Instead of linking Tacoma and Federal Way to the rest of the region, it would – ta da! – extend the trolley-like rail service on Tacoma’s Pacific Avenue all the way to Tacoma General Hospital. Maybe even as far as Tacoma Community College.

Whoopee.

As the agency’s board contemplates the politics of its next step, it needs to be clear on something: Any package that doesn’t provide for light rail to Pierce County is going to run into an insurgency down here. Let’s be double clear: This opinion page will be the loudest part of that insurgency.

Not that the line must be built in its entirety if there’s simply not enough money to do so. Sound Transit is looking at trimming down the taxes voters rejected in November’s failed Roads & Transit proposal. But even if the South Sound’s rail connection to the airport and beyond isn’t all built at once, it had better remain one of the agency’s overriding, top-of-the-list priorities.

That might mean buying right-of-way if rail can’t go the distance. But it emphatically does not mean shifting the focus to expensive projects inside Tacoma as development and escalating real estate prices in South King County permanently foreclose the option of light rail in the future.

Some on the board want to put the transit package on this fall’s ballot without funding for the Tacoma-to-airport link. They think the presidential-year turnout and a lower price tag will help put such a package over the top.

Big miscalculation.

Whatever the price tag, a lot of people in Pierce and South King counties won’t think much of a plan that denies them a rail connection to the heart of the region’s economy. Nor will folks in places like Puyallup and Lakewood be enthralled by the idea of dumping regional transit money into projects that will chiefly help Tacomans get around town.

Have we been clear enough? We’ll put it another way to the Sound Transit board: Kiss off light rail for the South Sound, kiss off the South Sound.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

US Light Rail Systems by Ridership and Track Miles

Rank System Largest city served Daily ridership Date Miles of track
1 MBTA T Green line and Ashmont–Mattapan High Speed Line* Boston 255,100 Third quarter of 2007 25.4[2]
2 Muni Metro, cable car, and F Market* San Francisco 146,200 Third quarter of 2007 66.1[3] + 5.4[3]
3 Los Angeles County Metro Rail Blue, Green, and Gold lines* Los Angeles 134,400 Third quarter of 2007 55.7[4]
4 San Diego Trolley San Diego 124,300 Third quarter of 2007 53.5[5]
5 MAX Light Rail and Portland Streetcar Portland 107,900 Third quarter of 2007 44[6] + 6.0[7]
6 SEPTA Subway-Surface Lines, Suburban Trolley Lines, and Girard Avenue Trolley* Philadelphia 89,600 Third quarter of 2007 60[8]
7 MetroLink St. Louis 82,000 Third quarter of 2007 46[9]
8 DART Light Rail, MATA streetcar Dallas 62,200 Third quarter of 2007 45[10] + 3.6[11]
9 RTD Light Rail Denver 59,700 Third quarter of 2007 35[12]
10 Sacramento Regional Transit District Light Rail Sacramento 49,500 Second quarter of 2007 36.9[13]
11 UTA TRAX Salt Lake City 042,500 First quarter of 2007[14] 19[15]
12 METRORail Houston 41,700 Third quarter of 2007 7.5[16]
13 Santa Clara VTA Light Rail San Jose 36,000 Third quarter of 2007 28.6[17]
14 Hiawatha Line Minneapolis 29,500 Third quarter of 2007 12[18]
15 Baltimore Light Rail* Baltimore 27,300 Third quarter of 2007 30.0[19]
16 Hudson-Bergen Light Rail* Jersey City 25,850[20] Second quarter of 2006 27.2[20]
17 The T Pittsburgh 24,200 Third quarter of 2007 25[21]
18 Buffalo Metro Rail Buffalo 19,100 Third quarter of 2007 6.4[22]
19 Newark Light Rail* Newark 18,000[20] Second quarter of 2006 9.9[20]
20 The Rapid Blue and Green Lines* Cleveland 11,400 Third quarter of 2007[14] 15[23]
21 River Line Trenton 7,350[20] Second quarter of 2006 69.7[20]
22 Streetcars in New Orleans New Orleans 4,500 Third quarter of 2007 21.5[24][25]
23 Memphis RTA Main Street Trolley Memphis 003,300 Third quarter of 2007 7[26]
24 Tacoma Link Tacoma 2,873[27] First quarter of 2007 1.6[28]
25 TECO Line Streetcar System Tampa 800 Third quarter of 2007 2.3[7]
26 Charlotte Trolley Charlotte 700[29] Fourth quarter of 2004 2.1[30]
27 River Rail Streetcar Little Rock 340[31] 2005 2.5[7]
28 Kenosha Transit Kenosha 300 Second quarter of 2007 2.0[7]
29 Island Transit trolley Galveston 200 Second quarter of 2007 5.2[32]


[edit] Ridership per Mile

The following is a list of light rail systems in the United States, ranked by ridership per mile of track. Figures are computed using the 'ridership' and 'miles of track' numbers above.
Rank Largest city served Ridership per mile
1 Boston 10,043
2 Houston 5,560
3 Buffalo 2,984
4 Minneapolis 2,458
5 Los Angeles 2,412
6 San Diego 2,323
7 Salt Lake City 2,237
8 Portland 2,158
9 San Francisco 2,045
10 Newark 1,818
11 Tacoma 1,799
12 St. Louis 1,782
13 Denver 1,705
14 Philadelphia 1,493
15 Sacramento 1,341
16 Dallas 1,280
17 San Jose 1,258
18 Pittsburgh 968
19 Jersey City 950
20 Baltimore 910
21 Cleveland 760
22 Memphis 529
23 Tampa 391
24 Charlotte 333
25 New Orleans 209
26 Kenosha 150
27 Little Rock 136
28 Trenton 105
29 Galveston 38

Notes

1. ^ American Public Transportation Association, Light Rail Transit Ridership Report, Third Quarter 2007.
2. ^ Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, Transportation System Performance, The MBTA System: Quick Facts, 2003.
3. ^ a b San Francisco Municipal Railway, Short Range Transit Plan, Chapter 8: Infrastructure Program, December 6, 2005.
4. ^ Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Facts at a Glance, June 19, 2007.
5. ^ Metropolitan Transit System, Fact Sheet, May 2007.
6. ^ Tri-Met, Facts about Tri-Met, October 2006.
7. ^ a b c d American Public Transportation Association, APTA Streetcar and Heritage Trolley Site, Overview.
8. ^ SEPTA, SEPTA Operating Facts, Fiscal Year 2006.
9. ^ St. Louis Metro, Inside Metrolink, 2007.
10. ^ Dallas Area Rapid Transit, DART Rail Facts
11. ^ American Public Transportation Association, APTA Streetcar and Heritage Trolley Site, Dallas Overview.
12. ^ Regional Transit District, RTD Facts, February, 2006; Regional Transit District, About Southeast Light Rail, 2007.
13. ^ Sacramento Regional Transit District, RT at a Glance.
14. ^ a b American Public Transportation Association, Light Rail Transit Ridership Report, First Quarter 2007.
15. ^ Schneider, Keith. "A Rail Line Drives Development in Utah", New York Times, April 22, 2007.
16. ^ News: News Releases
17. ^ Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Web Site, Frequently Asked Questions, Where does VTA provide service?
18. ^ Metro Transit, Facts about trains and construction, 2007.
19. ^ Roads to the Future: Baltimore Central Light Rail Line
20. ^ a b c d e f New Jersey Transit, Facts at a Glance, Fiscal Year 2006. The APTA combines statistics for all New Jersey Transit light rail operations, which includes the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail, the Newark Light Rail, and the River Line.
21. ^ Port Authority of Allegheny County, T Quick Facts.
22. ^ NFTA-Metro, Metro Rail Facts, 2004.
23. ^ Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, RTA Facts.
24. ^ [1] Saint Charles Line
25. ^ [2]Canal and Riverfront line
26. ^ [3]Memphis Streetcar
27. ^ Sound Transit, Quarterly Performance Report, First Quarter 2007.
28. ^ Sound Transit, Light Rail Fares
29. ^ Ridership Is Low For Charlotte's Morning Trolley Service - Charlotte News Story - WSOC Charlotte
30. ^ American Public Transportation Association, APTA Streetcar and Heritage Trolley Site, Charlotte, July 2005.
31. ^ MassTransitMag.com » Article » Builders Like Rail Line, but Riders are Sparse
32. ^ American Public Transportation Association, APTA Streetcar and Heritage Trolley Site - Galveston Overview,

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Tacoma Light Rail is still free; only grows by 4%

Last updated March 10, 2008 10:44 p.m. PT
Sound Transit ridership rose 12.5% in 2007
Gasoline prices, new services cited for increase

By LEVI PULKKINEN
P-I REPORTER

Seattle-area commuters turned to mass transit in record numbers in 2007, boosting local ridership well above the national average, according to a study released Monday.

Light rail ridership accounted for much of the increase nationally, a fact that has some Puget Sound transportation planners anticipating even greater increases locally when the region's first light rail system comes online in 2009.

"We think this region is really ready for light rail," said Linda Robson, a spokeswoman for Sound Transit, the three-county transit agency building the light rail line.

Sound Transit saw ridership increase 12.5 percent in 2007, compared with a national increase of about 2 percent, according to the American Public Transportation Association, an international organization representing the transit industry.

Riders, pushed by rising gas prices and new services, took about 1.5 million more trips on express buses and commuter trains operated by Sound Transit.

The King County Department of Transportation saw the number of rides increase by 7.5 million, amounting to a 7 percent increase over 2006.

Robson said Sound Transit saw its largest increases in use of the Sounder commuter train, which runs on existing rail lines between Tacoma and Everett. The agency added several runs last year, including morning and evening trains for Seattle-area commuters who work in Tacoma.

In a statement, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels credited new services and skyrocketing gas prices with the increases.

"Each year more and more people discover that taking transit is better than dealing with rising congestion and high gas prices," said Nickels, who is chairman of the Sound Transit board. "We will continue focusing on keeping those ridership numbers climbing. ... There is a lot riding on our success."

Nationally, public transportation use has increased 32 percent in the past 12 years, according to the association's statistics. The number of miles traveled on U.S. highways increased 24 percent during the same period.

Last year's increase outpaced Sound Transit projections, Robson said, and early ridership figures this year seem to be a repeat of that success.

Part of the reason for the local increase might be the partial closure of Interstate 5 for repaving work in August. During a two-week period, Sounder trains made extra trips to accommodate passengers who normally would drive the highway and averaged about 2,700 more fares per day than in July on its Tacoma-Seattle trains during the project.

The Elliott Bay Water Taxi, Washington State Ferries and Metro buses all saw increased ridership during the construction.

Robson said the agency is looking forward to an even greater increase after December 2009, when the light rail line between Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport is completed.

The first leg of light rail connecting downtown Seattle with Tukwila is expected to open in July 2009, with the airport connection to follow months later, Robson said.

Sound Transit projects that its ridership will double after the completion of the Seattle-to-airport line.

"Every time we add service for any of our modes, we see an increase in our ridership," Robson said. "Higher gas prices are certainly encouraging people to explore other ways of commuting."

The agency also expects to begin work later this year on a rail extension connecting the University of Washington with the airport-bound line. About $100 million for the project, which would come into service in 2016, is included in the Bush administration's proposed budget for fiscal 2009.

Metro Transit spokeswoman Linda Thielke said the King County agency saw its biggest increases in vanpool ridership and on recently reorganized routes in South King County. On an average weekday last year, riders took 365,000 trips on Metro buses and vans.

"There just seems to be a real pent-up demand out there," she said.

WHERE WE RANK

COMMUTER RAIL, BY PERCENT INCREASE IN RIDERSHIP SINCE 2006:

1. Nashville, Tenn. -- 258 percent

2. Santa Fe, N.M. -- 97 percent

3. Harrisburg, Pa. -- 41 percent

4. Seattle -- 27 percent

5. Oakland, Calif. -- 14 percent

National average -- 5 percent

BUS SERVICE

1. Seattle -- 8 percent

2. Denver-- 7 percent

3. Minneapolis -- 5 percent

National average -- 1 percent

LIGHT RAIL AND TROLLEYS

1. New Orleans -- 129 percent

2. Denver -- 66 percent

3. St. Louis -- 27 percent

4. Philadelphia -- 26 percent

5. Kenosha, Wis. -- 19 percent

Seattle -- 4 percent*

National average -- 6 percent

*The 1.6-mile Tacoma Link streetcar was the only light rail operating in the Seattle area in 2007

Monday, March 10, 2008

History of Sound Transit

Sound Transit -- A Snapshot History
HistoryLink.org Essay 8002

1/1/07
Sound Transit is the agency responsible for building and operating high-capacity public transit systems in the heavily populated areas of King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Officially the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (RTA), Sound Transit operates light rail, commuter rail, and express buses. It also builds high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane improvements, transit stations, park and ride lots, and related facilities. Sound Transit has been headquartered in Seattle's historic Union Station since November 1999.

Growing Needs, Early Planning

Until 1940, the Puget Sound region had a well-developed rail and bus system linking Everett, Seattle, Tacoma, and intermediate points, but it fell out of favor and was replaced by a growing highway system. As traffic congestion and suburban sprawl increased, repeated attempts were made to re-create a regional rail-transit system, but King County voters rejected various options proposed in 1958, 1962, 1968, and 1970.

Metro Transit, an all-bus system now operated by King County, was approved in 1972, and an advisory ballot measure supporting development of a rail system passed in 1988. The state's 1990 High Capacity Transportation Act authorized King, Pierce and Snohomish counties to create a single agency to plan, build, and operate a high-capacity transit system within the region's most heavily used travel corridors. The three-county Joint Regional Policy Committee, created in 1990 to plan for a regional transit system, grew into the RTA, which held its first board of directors' meeting in September 1993. The name Sound Transit was adopted in August 1997.

On March 14, 1995, voters rejected the RTA's $6.7 billion plan for a regional transit system, but on November 5, 1996, they approved a scaled-back version valued at $3.9 billion by a 56.5 percent to 43.5 percent margin. The measure received a majority of votes in each of the three counties in the Sound Transit district (58.8 percent in King County, 54.4 percent in Snohomish County, and 50.1 percent in Pierce County).

The 1996 plan, known as Sound Move, included new regional bus routes, commuter trains, light rail, and a number of transit center, park-and-ride lot, and HOV access projects. The vote authorized a local 0.4 percent sales tax and 0.3 percent motor-vehicle-excise tax (MVET) to finance the construction and operation of the regional transit system, making it one of the largest public works projects in the region’s history.

Light Rail

Light rail, a modern version of the trolleys and trams that have run on city streets throughout the world for more than a century, was envisioned in both Seattle and Tacoma as part of the 1996 plan. The $80.4 million, 1.6-mile Tacoma Link light rail line opened on August 22, 2003. It runs from S 9th Street in the downtown theater district through the business district, and ends at the Tacoma Dome Station, where passengers can connect to Sounder commuter trains and buses. The Tacoma Link light rail system runs at street level at posted street speed limits (25 miles per hour). Despite its limited length and some disruptions during construction, ridership has exceeded projections.

The initial light rail line in Seattle, scheduled for completion in 2009, will travel under downtown in the transit tunnel completed in 1990 and used only by buses until 2005. (Despite having been built with rail in mind, the tunnel had to be reconfigured to meet modern track and platform standards, and is closed for construction from 2005-2007.) The line, known as Central Link and Airport Link, totals 15.7 miles and will connect downtown Seattle, the SoDo/stadiums area, Beacon Hill, Rainier Valley, Tukwila, and Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

Getting to the airport has not been easy for Sound Transit. The initial estimates turned out to be significantly less than the reality, with the initial cost for a 21-mile line growing from $2.4 billion to $4.2 billion. In the wake of this revelation, Paul Bay, Sound Transit's director of Link light rail resigned in November 2000, followed by Bob White, the agency's executive director, in January 2001. Joni Earl, formerly the chief operating officer of Sound Transit, was appointed in an acting capacity, and was given permanent status in June 2001.

In April 2001, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Inspector General released a report criticizing the project's financial planning, which led to Federal grant funds being suspended. In late May, Sound Transit's Executive Director told the agency's board of directors that the light rail project might need to be abandoned. But in November, the Sound Transit board approved a shortened, $2.4 billion, 14-mile line that started in downtown, eliminating Capitol Hill, First Hill, and the University District, and cut the line about a mile short of the airport, potentially leaving light rail riders needing to take a shuttle bus from S 154th Street in Tukwila to the airport terminal. But in October 2003, the Federal grant was finally released, and in early 2005, bids for construction came in sufficiently under budget to allow the airport extension to be added again to the project, ending the jokes about building a "line to nowhere."

By that time, however, disruptions related to construction were being felt at all points along the line, especially in Beacon Hill and the Rainier Valley. As of February 2006, 44 of the 274 businesses along Martin Luther King Jr. Way, where much of the line's construction is taking place, were no longer operating, despite $7.5 million in "mitigation funds" from the Rainier Valley Community Development Fund. And local minority construction workers had staged rallies protesting that African Americans were not receiving an equitable share of construction work for the project. Adverse weather and unexpected soil conditions had also delayed construction; nevertheless, by February 2006 the line was reported to be more than one-third complete, and was on schedule for opening in 2009.

In April 2006, the Sound Transit board approved the route for the second Seattle light rail line, called University Link, which would extend from the end of the first line at the Convention Center, through Capitol Hill to Husky Stadium on the University of Washington campus. Construction is planned to begin in 2008 and be completed in 2016.

Preliminary planning is also underway for the "East Link" line from Seattle to Bellevue. This line would require placing rails on the Interstate 90 floating bridge, and there had been concerns that the bridge could not bear the weight of the train cars. So in September 2005, a test simulating the weight of the trains was undertaken, and the results indicated that the line could be built on the bridge if it was modified by removing some of the concrete, a task estimated to cost $31 million. The total cost for East Link had not yet been determined.

Commuter Rail

The "Sounder" commuter rail service began in September 2000 with two trains in each direction between Tacoma and Seattle’s King Street Station every weekday. The two-level Sounder passenger cars featured comfortable seats, restrooms, cup holders, water fountains, work tables, protected outlets for laptop computers and storage areas for bicycles, wheelchairs and strollers. On its first day, Sounder carried more than 1,100 passengers. In April of 2001, Sounder began running Sounder trains to Sunday Seattle Mariners baseball games. The “Home Run” service quickly became popular, and was expanded to serve Seattle Seahawks football games in August 2002.

The Tacoma-Seattle service is one leg of an 82-mile commuter rail system with 12 stations using existing railroad tracks between Everett, Seattle, Tacoma, and Lakewood. Service from Everett to Seattle was delayed during protracted negotiations for use of the line between Sound Transit and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad, which owns the tracks. BNSF wanted Sound Transit to pay for the cost of improving the line, including building a second track along portions of the line that had only one track, and a $250 million agreement between Sound Transit and BNSF was signed on May 29, 2003. On December 22, 2003, Everett-Seattle Sounder service finally began with one train running south from Everett to Seattle's King Street Station in the morning and one train running north in the afternoon. Each train also stopped in Edmonds.

Delays also occurred as the tracks, which run along the shores of Puget Sound for much of the distance between Seattle and Everett, were blocked by mudslides caused by heavy rains several times in 2004 and 2006.

Ridership on Sounder has been lower than expected, but as of 2006 the agency was operating four round-trips daily between Tacoma and Seattle, and two daily between Seattle and Everett. It had also made an agreement with Amtrak that allows Sound Transit commuters to use Amtrak's Seattle-to-Everett trains. Two additional Tacoma-Seattle trips are planned for September 2007.

Commuter Buses

While perhaps receiving the least attention of its services, Sound Transit's express bus service aimed at commuters was the first of the agency's operations to begin. In September 1999, Sound Transit began operating nine new ST Express regional bus routes. Drivers from King County Metro, Snohomish County's Community Transit, and Pierce Transit actually operate the buses. By 2006, Sound Transit operated approximately 25 separate routes.

Sound Transit is funding freeway HOV direct-access ramps. This unique partnership, in which a regional transit agency is underwriting improvements to state highways, is intended to ensure fast and reliable local and regional bus service, encourage carpool and vanpool use, and eliminate the need for buses and carpools to weave through general traffic at freeway entrances and exits.

Sound Transit has also participated in public-private partnerships for "transit-oriented development," communities that incorporate transit into their planning. Such developments as the Village at Overlake Station, which was billed as "King County's first combination apartment complex/transit station," (Singer) are designed to encourage transit use and reduce sprawl.

Equal Slices of the Pie

Because it was recognized that voter approval for significant transit improvements would be stronger in urban areas, only voters in the most congested areas of King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties were asked to approve -- and pay for -- the regional transit system. The agency's service boundary generally follows the urban growth boundaries created by each county in accordance with the state's 1990 Growth Management Act.

In addition, safeguards were built into the plan ensuring that tax revenues from specific areas would be used to benefit projects in those areas. This concept, known as "subarea equity," divided the Sound Transit service area into five districts: Snohomish County, North King County, South King County, East King County, and Pierce County. Simultaneous work has been undertaken on projects in each of the subareas, but services and fares are being integrated throughout the region.

Sound Transit is governed by an 18-member Board of Directors; 17 members are local elected officials, and the 18th member is the Washington State Department of Transportation Secretary. Local elected officials include mayors, city council members, county executives, and county council members from within the Sound Transit District. Currently, the Sound Transit Board includes three members from Snohomish County, 10 from King County, four from Pierce County, and the State Transportation Department secretary.

Sound Transit skinnying down its thinking for next ballot

Sound Transit shortens its light-rail ambitions

Seattle Times transportation reporter

Sound Transit's next ballot measure could offer less light rail, more commuter trains and more buses than Proposition 1, the Roads & Transit measure voters rejected in November.

Transit officials have not decided on a plan, or whether it would go to voters this year, or in 2010. But the latest concept, released Thursday by the transit agency, includes:

• Light-rail extensions by 2020 to reach Northgate and Kent-Des Moines Road — shorter than the Proposition 1 goals of reaching north Lynnwood and downtown Tacoma. But an east line would still stretch from Seattle to Overlake.

• An Everett streetcar.

• Extensions of downtown Tacoma light rail, west to Tacoma Community College.

• Bus rapid transit between Snohomish County and a Northgate freeway station. From there, morning commuters could stay on the bus to downtown Seattle. Or they could walk on a pedestrian bridge across Interstate 5, to meet light-rail trains bound for the University of Washington and Capitol Hill.

• Possible short diesel trains on the Eastside, from Woodinville to north Renton.

• A boost in Sounder service south of Seattle, from the currently funded nine weekday round trips to a total 15 round trips.

Sound Transit skinnying down its thinking for next ballot

Sound Transit shortens its light-rail ambitions

Seattle Times transportation reporter

Sound Transit's next ballot measure could offer less light rail, more commuter trains and more buses than Proposition 1, the Roads & Transit measure voters rejected in November.

Transit officials have not decided on a plan, or whether it would go to voters this year, or in 2010. But the latest concept, released Thursday by the transit agency, includes:

• Light-rail extensions by 2020 to reach Northgate and Kent-Des Moines Road — shorter than the Proposition 1 goals of reaching north Lynnwood and downtown Tacoma. But an east line would still stretch from Seattle to Overlake.

• An Everett streetcar.

• Extensions of downtown Tacoma light rail, west to Tacoma Community College.

• Bus rapid transit between Snohomish County and a Northgate freeway station. From there, morning commuters could stay on the bus to downtown Seattle. Or they could walk on a pedestrian bridge across Interstate 5, to meet light-rail trains bound for the University of Washington and Capitol Hill.

• Possible short diesel trains on the Eastside, from Woodinville to north Renton.

• A boost in Sounder service south of Seattle, from the currently funded nine weekday round trips to a total 15 round trips.

Tacoma Light Rail launched; project 60% over budget

Tacoma's light rail -- 1.6 historic miles
8/23/03
By JANE HADLEY
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

TACOMA -- It may be short, but don't underestimate it, said Tacoma leaders yesterday as they launched the state's first modern light rail system in a hail of fireworks and confetti.

"This is a delicious taste of what's going to be delivered 40 miles north of here," said King County Executive Ron Sims, chairman of the Sound Transit board.

That was a reference to Seattle's long-delayed light rail line, which could begin construction before the end of the year.

But yesterday was Tacoma's day.

The Tacoma Link train glided smoothly from the Tacoma Dome through downtown to the theater district. It's a distance of 1.6 miles, but it will tie the whole world to Tacoma, said City Councilman Kevin Phelps, chairman of Sound Transit's finance committee.

Along that route, the trains will stop at South 25th Street, near a fast-developing area of restaurants, stores and residences; at Union Station, near museums and the University of Washington's Tacoma branch campus; and at the future Convention Center, which is under construction.

But the key stop is the Tacoma Dome Station, where light rail riders can get on a Sounder train headed north, a Sound Transit regional express or Pierce Transit bus in any direction, an Amtrak train or a Greyhound bus.

Parking garages there provide 2,400 spaces.

One of the first non-official riders yesterday was Helen Miller, 72, who lives in Puyallup. Miller, the daughter of a brakeman on the Great Northern Railroad, read about the launch of the light rail line in the newspaper and decided to come in and try it. She plans to use the train to go downtown to shop and look around.

"I think people will go for it," she said. "I'm all for it."

It's hard to beat the price: free.

The Link trains will run every 10 minutes, 14 hours a day Monday through Saturday, beginning at 6 a.m. weekdays and 8 a.m. on Saturday. Sundays they will run every 20 minutes between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m.

The trains, which can carry 30 seated and 26 standing passengers, won't go over the 25 mph speed limit. They get an automatic green light when they're going through intersections. The ride is smooth.

The $80.4 million project cost more than the $50 million predicted in the 1996 Sound Move plan but came in under the budget adopted for it three years ago. It also came in ahead of schedule. Sound Transit predicts the line will carry 2,000 passengers a day by 2010.

In 1993, things were so slow in downtown Tacoma that the city actually celebrated the opening of a coffee shop, Phelps said. In trying to get the city moving, business leaders knew it would take more than just a store here and a restaurant there.

"We knew we needed a way to link it all together," Phelps said. Taken by itself, a 1.6-mile light rail line is not a good investment, Phelps said. But by linking the city's museums, theaters, university, business center, convention center and residences to each other and to the transit hub at the Tacoma Dome, the light rail system will be a major boon to Tacoma's ongoing renaissance, he said.

Some folks eating lunch at Freighthouse Square across the street from the Tacoma Dome Station agreed, though not all.

Becky Summers, 30, a medical records specialist who commutes to Tacoma from Gig Harbor, was positive on the new line.

"I think it's a good idea," she said. Summers said she will probably drive to the Freighthouse Square area and hop on Tacoma Link to get downtown for shopping and entertainment.

Stephenie Kuntz, 28, who works at Frank Russell, an international brokerage company, plans to get on the light rail line at the theater district station at lunchtime and take it to Pacific Avenue downtown or Freighthouse Square.

But Robert Carey, who works at a truck dealership in the port area, does not welcome the new line nor expect to use it.

"I just think it's a waste of spending and government should do something better with their money," he said.

Among those who turned out for the launch yesterday were Rep. Norm Dicks and Rep. Adam Smith, both Washington Democrats; Tacoma Mayor Bill Baarsma; Pierce County Executive John Ladenburg; former state Rep. Ruth Fisher, D-Tacoma, whom many credited for providing crucial support; and many members of Sound Transit's board.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Citizens Panel worried about Sound Transit's Rising Costs

Citizens’ Year-End 2007

Performance Report on Sound Transit



February 21, 2008
Dick Chapin
Sound Transit Board
Honorable Greg Nickels, Chair
Union Station
401 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104
Dear Chair Nickels and Board Members:

We are happy to report that on balance Sound Transit’s progress in delivering the regional transit system was good in 2007. On the other hand, we continue to have areas of concern that we believe require close monitoring to prevent them from becoming problems.

The progress is summarized below.
Capital Projects Moving Forward. There was visible progress along the entire Central Link alignment, including in the design and planning of the next stages of the regional light rail system, University Link and East Link. Regional Express capital projects opened for service on I-405 at Canyon Park in Bothell and at Totem Lake in Kirkland. Five additional projects were under construction. Sounder projects at Mukilteo and Lakewood Stations were in construction, as was continuing work on track and signal improvements to add capacity to the
commuter rail system.

Ridership Growth. Service was added on ST Express bus and Sounder, resulting in increased ridership of 27% on Sounder and 10% on Express bus, both exceeding expectations for the year.

State of the Agency. Positive reports from federal oversight, state and financial compliance audits and a performance audit of Link testified to the soundness and strong management of the agency. These reviews demonstrate that despite numerous challenges that the agency faced, this is a mature, effective organization with an accumulation of knowledge and skills that greatly benefit our region.

While there is much good news to report, there were challenges and disappointments as well.

Failure of Proposition 1. The biggest setback in 2007 was the failure of voters to approve Proposition 1. In hindsight, the defeat is attributable to many factors including the overall size of the combined roads and transit measure, difficulty in explaining the costs of the combined measure, and still diminished (but rebounding) credibility that lingers from the problems the agency faced in 2000-2001. We applaud the agency’s willingness to incorporate these lessons learned into a serious investigation of a reconstituted proposal for system expansion that could be presented to voters either this fall, or in the fall of 2010.
Construction and Planning Environment. The continuing tight construction
market in the region, third party funding shortfalls, scoping and siting
disagreements, and property disputes all took their toll on schedules and budgets
in 2007.

Need to Improve Access to Transit Services. As ridership has steadily grown
on Sounder and ST Express, some routes are reaching capacity constraints. ST
Express has all of its buses in use and cannot add significant new service. The
Sounder south corridor has developed access issues at its stations in Sumner,
Puyallup and Auburn where either new parking capacity, local feeder service or
both are needed. These issues highlight the need for regional cooperation among
Sound Transit and other agencies on sensitive policy issues affecting cost-
effectiveness in use of resources and who pays for which services.
Transit Operating Costs. Our previously expressed concerns continue on the
growth in operating costs of Sound Transit’s bus service, and are joined this year by a concern about a rise in the costs of Tacoma Link. ST Express and Tacoma Link total costs both grew 10% in 2007. These growth rates are unsustainable
when compared to the 5% cost growth that Sound Transit continues to assume for future year planning purposes.

Transition from Capital to Operations. Over the years, COP has highlighted the need for improvement in various areas. As the agency draws closer to
beginning service for Central Link, we would draw the Board’s attention to an area that is fraught with potential for surprises: the transition from capital project to operations. We are concerned about the complexity of coordination created by the fact that operation is not entirely in Sound Transit’s control.
These challenges do not detract from the successes. Sound Transit is a thriving organization with strong leadership and management. We urge you to be diligent in oversight of the weakest areas, as we promise to be as well.

Sincerely,
CITIZEN OVERSIGHT PANEL


Richard U. Chapin
Chair

Cc: Joni Earl

Introduction
The Sound Transit Citizen Oversight Panel (COP) is a 15-member volunteer body appointed by the Sound Transit Board to oversee and monitor the implementation of Sound Move, the voter approved regional transit plan. The Panel communicates to the Board periodically as issues arise. In addition, it has prepared progress reports since the program’s inception. This is the Panel’s nineteenth report and covers Sound Transit’s performance during 2007.

Summary of Sound Transit Performance in 2007


Accomplishments
Sound Transit’s progress in delivering the regional transit system was good in 2007. The agency met 36 of the 43 milestones it set at the beginning of the year. Despite numerous challenges the agency faced, Sound Transit continued to demonstrate that it is a mature, effective organization with an accumulation of knowledge and skills that greatly benefit our region.

Capital Projects Moving Forward. Most prominently, there was visible progress along the
entire Central Link alignment. The surface street disruptions on Pine Street downtown and along
Martin Luther King Way South were replaced by new pavement, plantings and artwork.
Trackwork and stations began to appear in the Rainier Valley corridor. Elevated guideways
along I-5 emerged from fenced construction sites and stations began to rise at McClellan Street
in South Seattle and International Boulevard in Tukwila. The Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel
reopened on time to the public and to bus travel. Construction was very much in evidence at the
airport. The Central Link Initial Segment is now 85% complete and on schedule to open for
service in July 2009. The next stages of the regional light rail system, University Link and East Link, continue to make good progress in the design and planning stages respectively.

Regional Express capital projects opened for service on I-405 at Canyon Park in Bothell and at Totem Lake in Kirkland. Additional projects were under construction in South Everett, at the Bothell Branch Campus, on Mercer Island, on I-90 in Bellevue, and in Issaquah. Ten additional projects throughout Snohomish and East King Counties are under development by localjurisdictions with significant funding contributions by Sound Transit.

Sounder projects at Mukilteo Station in Snohomish County, and at South Tacoma and Lakewood Stations in Pierce County were in construction, as was continuing work on track and signal
improvements to add capacity to the commuter rail system.

Ridership Growth. 2007 saw added service to ST Express bus and Sounder commuter rail and the significant increases in ridership that resulted. Ridership was up 27% on Sounder and 10% on ST Express, both exceeding expectations.

Challenges and Issues


Failure of Proposition 1. The biggest setback in 2007 was the defeat of Proposition 1. The
Legislature’s decision to yoke the transit and the roads plans into a single ballot resulted in a
whole that was not compelling to voters. While hindsight is always 20/20, and obviously many
factors were involved, including the overall size of the combined roads and transit measure,
difficulty in explaining the costs of the combined measure, and still diminished (but rebounding) credibility that lingers from the problems the agency faced in 2000-2001. We applaud the agency’s professionalism in moving forward and willingness to incorporate lessons learned from the voters as it considers new options for system expansion. We hope any modified ST2 plan that is adopted will make a stronger effort to communicate to the public the cost effectiveness of its individual elements and the environmental benefits of regional transit overall. Need to Improve Access to Transit Services. As ridership has steadily grown on Sounder and ST Express, some routes are reaching capacity constraints. ST Express has all of its buses in use and cannot add significant new service until new buses and the related maintenance base capacity are acquired. Access issues have developed in the Sounder south corridor at the stations in Sumner, Puyallup and Auburn where either new parking capacity, local feeder service or both are needed. These are critical to Sound Transit’s continued ability to serve the growing demand.
These issues also highlight the need for a high level of regional cooperation and decision making
among Sound Transit, local transit agencies and local governments. While a great deal of
voluntary coordination takes place among the parties, it may not be enough and may tend to
avoid some of the most sensitive issues affecting cost-effectiveness in use of resources and who
pays for which services.

Construction and Planning Environment. As we have reported in the past several years, Link and other capital projects encountered various obstacles related to the very tight construction
market in the region. The bid climate, the skilled labor shortages and the rising prices of
materials again took a toll on budgets and schedules. Numerous projects received bids higherthan the engineer’s estimates and schedules have slipped on both Link and REX construction contracts. Other projects, in particular the Pierce County Sounder track and signal projects are behind schedule in the engineering phases due to delays in reaching agreement on a preferred alternative or for other reasons.

Transit Operating Costs. We have reported repeatedly on the unsustainable growth inoperating costs of Sound Transit’s bus service. This year we are also reporting a concern about a worrisome spike of 10% in the Tacoma Link operating costs from 2006 to 2007. Tacoma Link is operated entirely by Sound Transit and the number of hours of service provided was flat, so this increase is of special concern. For ST Express, 2007 again saw an increase of 10% in the net-operating expense and about 6% in the cost per hour of service, for the third year in a row. A much higher increase is projected in 2008. The most recent estimates indicate a 2008 rate of $129.35 per full Sound Transit platform hour. This cost is up 13.6% over 2007, based on preliminary year-end figures. This increase is affected by a one-time payment of $3 million to King County for the use of the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel. If the $3 M is taken out of the calculation, the hourly cost is projected to be $124.42, still an increase of 9.2%. Staff believe that these estimates are conservative, nevertheless, this growth rate becomes a concern when compared to the 5% cost growth that Sound Transit continues to assume for future year planning purposes.

Transition from Capital to Operations. Over the years, COP has highlighted areas for
improvement at Sound Transit. As the agency draws closer to beginning service for Central
Link, we would draw the Board’s attention to an area that has great potential for surprises: the transition from capital project to operations. The recent computer software hiccup in the
downtown transit tunnel is an example of a type of problem we hope will not recur. We are concerned about the complexity of coordination and communication created by the fact that operation is contracted to King County Metro and is not entirely in Sound Transit’s control. Metro’s staffing plan is behind schedule and there appear to be continuing extended negotiations taking place about what appropriate staffing levels should be. We urge the Board to carefully monitor the rail activation planning that is taking place.

These challenges do not detract from the successes. Sound Transit is a thriving organization with strong leadership and management. As we have stated in the past, we urge regional and state policymakers, as they grapple with our regional transportation governance, to “do no harm.” Sound Transit has continued to grow in effectiveness and accumulated skill in recent years, and it is critical that we refrain from any changes in governance that could harm the strengths that Sound Transit has developed.

Review of Agency-Wide Activities
In addition to its major programs of designing and building capital projects and providing transit services, Sound Transit plans, coordinates and manages various regional activities and
supporting programs.

ST2 and Proposition 1. In 2007 a very significant agency effort was expended on the planning and adoption of ST2, followed by public information, outreach and communication activities, coordinated with the Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID). Sound Transit put forth its best efforts to meet what it believed was the public’s desire for a balanced plan that provided benefits to each part of the region. In the aftermath of the ballot measure’s failure, polling indicated that the joint roads and transit proposal was too large, too complicated and unconvincing as the best solution for our region’s transportation problems.

Environmentalists argued that Proposition 1 did not do enough to address greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Others believed that not all elements of the plan were cost effective investments. Surveys also indicated that despite its best efforts, Sound Transit still needs to win back full public confidence and that some voters wanted to see light rail in service before approving further taxes for system expansion. COP has observed that in response to these findings, the agency is hard at work developing new options for consideration. We look forward to the Board’s discussions. In the meantime, we have formed a COP task force to delve into our own study of high-capacity transit (HCT) planning in the region.

State of the Agency. The agency received positive feedback from several external reviews of its work in 2007. The Federal Transit Administration conducted one of its regular triennial reviews and 21 of 22 areas examined were found to be in good order. (The single area of deficiency was facilities maintenance which the agency has since strengthened with new staff and a new
facilities maintenance plan.)

Sound Transit’s independent financial audit and the state compliance audit were completely
clean and without findings, as was the annual review of adherence to subarea equity procedures.
The State Auditor’s performance audit of Link made a variety of recommendations that were
largely based on events and issues several years old and that had been identified in previous
performance audits. As required by law, management is providing a response and action plan to those findings.

Sound Transit’s professionalism and technical capacity continue to be strong. Despite the
uncertainty about long-term job security, staff turnover for 2007 was at about 18%, just a bit
higher than 2006. Link has largely been able to retain its core technical staff as management is
transitioning its capacity from the Initial Segment to Airport Link and University Link. A
number of other Sound Transit departments lost staff as projects wound down and as competing
organizations recruited from the agency. Senior management says it is not yet concerned about a brain drain but is proceeding cautiously in filling vacancies. Maintaining the positive personnel
environment at Sound Transit speaks very well of the superior executive leadership at the agency and the dedication of staff.

Smart Card. One commitment made in Sound Move that has unfortunately been delayed beyond anyone’s expectation is the integrated regional fare system. Smart Card has been in development among seven transit agencies for a decade and has experienced a variety of challenges. Integrating seven different fare structures is a prime example of the region’s complexity and has proven to be immensely difficult, as has the need to address security and privacy issues. Consultant project management issues have also plagued the project.
Nevertheless, the Smart Card project has now completed its beta test phase and is undergoing
design changes based on what was learned during that process. The electronic card reading
equipment is being installed on the region’s buses and at train and ferry facilities. While Smart
Card implementation has been seriously delayed, management states that it is now on track for
final rollout of the new system by the end of 2008 with full public use in early 2009.
Continuous Improvement. Last year we reported that the agency unveiled a Lessons Learned
program and a performance management system that represented the next stage of agency
commitment to a continuous quality improvement philosophy. These programs have taken a
while to get off the ground and COP will continue to monitor progress with interest as our
members believe these programs are a vital tool in continuing to build public confidence in the
agency. COP recently formed a Lessons Learned task force to examine how well individual
project lessons are being disseminated agency-wide and we will report to the Board on what we
observe.

Sustainability Initiative. In 2007 the Board directed and the agency began to implement a far-
reaching environmental initiative that is addressing fuel and water conservation, energy
efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, toxics reduction, ecosystem mitigation, procurement of
sustainable products, pollution prevention, and recycling, among numerous areas. Just recently
Sound Transit was awarded the ISO 14001 certification in recognition of these efforts, an honor
for which COP members congratulate the agency. We did note that, as a capital projects agency,
the success of this sustainability program will depend on the involvement of the construction
industry. We encourage Sound Transit to use contract language and incentives that will reward
contractors who are making efforts to work in an environmentally sustainable manner.

Management and Delivery of the Capital Program

As noted above in our summary, Sound Transit continued to make good progress in delivering the Sound Move capital program. Individual projects continue to be challenged by various
obstacles in the regional environment and continue to be met by strong efforts by Sound Transit to manage in this context.

Link Light Rail
Central Link Initial Segment. 2007 represented the high mark in Central Link construction
with most of the $400 million in budgeted spending for the year achieved as planned. At year-
end, the Link Initial Segment was 85% complete and progress was clearly visible along the entire
corridor. All construction contracts have been awarded except for the Southcenter Boulevard
improvements and the Tukwila Station Park and Ride expansion which was authorized for
contract award in January 2008. While the project is 85% complete, only 67% of the
construction contingency has been committed. Outstanding claims will almost certainly use up
additional contingency funds, but the $128 million program reserve is not expected to be needed.
The schedule has moved from an original six months of float to just nine days, however, this
remaining float has been holding steady for the past five months. The excavation of the Beacon Hill tunnel main shaft represents the critical path and the contractor has been maintaining the schedule. Management has stated that it is highly confident that the July 2009 service date will hold. However, if the nine-day schedule float slips any further, the agency and the Board will need to lower public expectations soon about a delayed beginning of service.
Following are some of the highlights of last year’s progress:

• On Pine Street in downtown Seattle, the surface street repaving is complete. The transit
tunnel conversion was completed on time and the tunnel reopened for bus service in
September.
• The Link Operation & Maintenance Facility at Forest Street in SODO is complete and
King County Metro, the contracted operator, has moved into the building. Fully
assembled light rail vehicles have been arriving on site.
• At the Beacon Hill tunnel, the tunnel boring machine broke through the east portal on the
southbound tunnel bore but did not complete the northbound bore by year-end as had
been scheduled. The project had to be shut down for a month due to a fatal accident on
site; also the contractor has not kept pace with the planned production rates. The
schedule slip on this segment is critical and Sound Transit has continued to work with the
contractor to try to make up the delay. The excavation of the Beacon Hill station is
complete. At the east end of the tunnel, the McClellan Station is progressing well with
structural steel and roofing complete. The aerial guideways on the east and west ends of
the tunnel are 99% complete.
• In the Rainier Valley, the repaving of Martin Luther King Jr. Way South has been
completed and the new streetscape with sidewalks and landscaping is pleasing to the eye. Track is being laid along the corridor and three stations are under construction (Columbia City, Othello and Rainier Beach) with completion due in the first quarter of 2008.
• In Tukwila, the 2,200 precast concrete segments of guideway are all in place and the
gantry was dismantled and moved on to its next project. The Tukwila International
Boulevard Station was completed and is in the process of being commissioned.

As is to be expected on any large construction project, there have been a variety of issues to
manage. Due to the project delays, the follow-on systems contractors have had to begin work on many sites while the civil contractors are still there. This has led to significant coordination
challenges. Disagreements between the agency and some of its contractors have led to
unresolved claims, one of which is currently in mediation. The challenge to consistently manage erosion control in some locations led to Department of Ecology fines. Sound Transit leadership and construction management staff are managing these issues closely and COP believes that there is openness in the reporting of these issues to the Board.


Airport Link. Sound Transit’s guideway and trackwork contract at the north end of the Airport is proceeding on schedule, however, the Port of Seattle’s contract to build parts of the guideway and relocate airport roadways has slipped. The critical path challenge is the Airport Station
which was split into two contracts after the sole bidder came in at almost twice the engineer’s
estimate. The station structural elements were awarded and are under construction. The station finishes have undergone value engineering and redesign and are scheduled to go to construction this year. Staff have stated that with careful coordination the December 2009 service date for
Airport Link will still be met.

University Link. While construction is proceeding on the Initial Segment and Airport Link,
University Link also made good progress in 2007. Engineering is moving forward, with the
tunnel contracts at 60% design and the Capitol Hill and Husky Stadium stations at 30% design
levels. In 2007, the Sound Transit-University of Washington master agreement was finally
signed after many years of difficult negotiations. Critical tasks going forward include the
submittal of the full funding grant agreement (FFGA) to the federal government and obtaining
Congressional approval of the $750 million grant; proceeding with right-of-way acquisition of
243 parcels and 138 business and residential relocations; and groundbreaking in the fourth
quarter of 2008.

Sounder
The Sounder capital program is 80% complete. On the Everett-Seattle Sounder commuter rail
segment, Sound Transit is responsible for regulatory permits, environmental mitigation, and the
construction of stations and a layover facility to store trains. The fourth and final easement was
acquired from Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad (BNSF) this year, providing the right to
run trains on the corridor in perpetuity. The first phase of constructing additional layover track
at Everett Station was completed, allowing the 3rd train to begin service in September 2007. The Mukilteo Station (north platform) is under construction and train service to Mukilteo will begin in 2008. The Everett station phase 2 has experienced difficulties with property acquisition and the Mukilteo (south platform) and Edmonds stations continue at schedule and budget risk due to complex funding and coordination issues related to planned Washington State Ferries terminals.

On the Tacoma-Seattle Sounder segment, phase 2 track and signal improvements are nearing completion of capacity improvements that will permit additional trains to be in service by
September 2008. Progress on the phase 2 improvements allowed the 5th and 6th trains to begin service in September 2007. The third phase of remediation at Reservation Connection was
completed in June 2007, establishing embankment stability and allowing that segment to be turned over for normal maintenance.

On the Tacoma-Lakewood segment, both sections are delayed: M Street-Lakewood is waiting to
accommodate WSDOT’s Point Defiance bypass project and D to M Street was delayed while
alternative alignments were analyzed and considered. M Street-Lakewood is now on track to go
to construction in the second quarter of 2008. On the D to M Street segment, the Board in
December selected a preferred alternative that includes a Pacific Street railroad overpass that
puts the project $70 million over budget. Sound Transit has just $25 million for the project and
must work with other parties to secure funds to fill the shortfall. The Lakewood Station is under construction, and the contract was awarded for the South Tacoma Station. .

Regional Express

Sound Transit successfully opened the Canyon Park Freeway Station and the Totem Lake
Freeway Station this year. The very striking Canyon Park project received recognition for its
design from the American Institute of Architects. Also in 2007, five projects began construction: the Totem Lake Transit Center, I-90 Two-Way Transit Stage 1, Bothell Branch Campus Access, SR522 Kenmore and North Everett Transit Center.

Two projects were scheduled for service in 2007 but were delayed: the Mercer Island Park and Ride and the Totem Lake Freeway Station. The Mercer Island Park and Ride experienced
consultant design errors resulting in almost a year’s delay and $2 million in increased cost. The Totem Lake Freeway Station experienced design errors by WSDOT that necessitated demolition and rebuilding part of the structure, leading to a $6 million cost overrun. The State Legislature is expected to authorize the $6 million to repay Sound Transit.

Schedule and budget risks continue for the Mountlake Terrace Freeway Station, I-90 Two-Way
Transit Stages 2 and 3, and the Renton HOV Access project. Mountlake Terrace has expanded
to cost more than is available in Sound Transit’s budget. Staff are trying value engineering and
scope reductions to reduce the cost. For I-90 Stages 2 and 3, Sound Transit has funded its share
of the projects but WSDOT’s share is partially funded (Stage 2) and unfunded (Stage 3).
Funding needs to be authorized for these projects as they are expected to provide capacity that is needed before work on the 520 bridge can begin. The Renton HOV project is on hold at 30%
design pending funding of WSDOT improvements on I-405 that must be completed first.
Ten projects are being implemented by third parties with capped contributions from Sound
Transit. These projects are all in various stages of design under the lead of the Cities of Everett,
Bothell, Kenmore, Redmond, Kirkland and Renton as well as Evergreen Health Care and King
County Metro. While Sound Transit’s contributions to these projects are capped by agreement,
some of these projects are behind schedule and over budget, and in a few cases local agencies are
asking Sound Transit to share in the increases. We urge the Board to stand firm on the terms of
the agreements. COP believes that Sound Transit should draft more stringent performance-based agreements in the future so that taxpayers do not end up contributing to unrealistic or poorly managed projects.


Transit Operations
Sound Transit operated four transit programs in 2007: Tacoma Link, Sounder, ST Express and
Accessible Services. Planning is actively underway for beginning service on Link light rail
between Downtown Seattle and Tukwila in July 2009, with service scheduled to be added to Sea- Tac Airport by December 2009. Transit services offered by Sound Transit again made very
positive gains in 2007 with ridership growing substantially on the two largest programs, Soundercommuter rail and ST Express bus. Despite the strong growth, Sound Transit’s ridership levels have not yet reached the original Sound Move forecasts.

Boardings on ST Express bus were up 10% (after growth of 11% last year). Weekday bus
boardings in the 4th quarter of 2007 stood at 37,000, compared to the 54,000 projected for 2010 in Sound Move. The strongest gains in riders occurred on the corridors connecting the region’s major urban centers, Everett-Seattle, Redmond-Seattle, Bellevue-Seattle and Tacoma-Seattle. On Sounder commuter rail, ridership was up 27% (on top of last year’s 42% growth), with the south corridor from Tacoma-Seattle representing by far the stronger market. Weekday boardings on the commuter rail service were at 8,800 in the 4th quarter, compared to the 2010 Sound Move forecast of 12,600. Tacoma Link ridership grew at a modest 4% in 2007.
ST Express. As noted in the summary section of this report, despite the strong demand, Sound
Transit is constrained for a variety of reasons in its ability to add service. The ST Express
service is limited by a lack of additional bus and maintenance base capacity and by steep growth
in costs. Route 511 Ash Way-Seattle and route 565 Federal Way-Overlake with 12 weekday
peak period trips each are at 100% (standing room only) capacity. Other routes are close behind.
The agency was able to add just 4% more hours of service in 2007. Also, the reliability of ST
Express is highly dependent on the capacity of the HOV system and the state’s willingness to
manage it.

We have reported repeatedly on the worrisome growth in operating costs of Sound Transit’s bus service. For the past three years, net operating costs have grown 10% per year and the costs per hour of service have grown at about 6% per year. Next year’s growth is budgeted to be even higher. These growth rates are unsustainable when compared to the 5% cost growth that Sound Transit continues to assume for future year planning purposes.

ST Express bus service is based on a negotiated rate per hour of purchased transportation with
the three local transit agency partners, King County Metro, Pierce Transit and Community
Transit, plus Sound Transit’s own overhead costs. The current 2008 forecast indicates a blended
rate of $129.35 per full Sound Transit platform hour (total time buses are in operation, including
time driving to and from the base and layovers between trips). This cost growth is up 13.6%
over 2007, due to a scheduled one-time payment of $3 million to King County Metro for debt
service on the downtown transit tunnel, but also due to rapid growth of partner hourly costs. If
the $3 M is taken out of the calculation, the hourly cost grows to $124.42, still an increase of
9.2%. These figures are changed from the published draft 2008 budget because of ongoing
partner negotiations over costs for 2008 and the incomplete reconciliation process for 2007.
This year’s cost growth is based on a 2008 platform hour of $115.90 (up 6.1%) at King County Metro, $93.45 (up 8.2%) at Community Transit, and $99.06 (up just 1.6%) at Pierce Transit.
Even with the strong growth in ridership, Sound Transit’s ST Express cost per boarding has been flat for the past three years.

Despite the concerns COP has over the ST Express operating costs, we were pleased to note that
some indicators are trending positive. As a result of strong bus ridership, the cost per boarding
has been flat at $6.50 for the past three years. The efficiency in bus operation has also improved,
as the ratio of revenue hours to total hours operated has steadily declined and in 2007 only 20% of hours were not carrying passengers (down from one-third a few years ago).

Sounder. For Sounder commuter rail service, costs per hour and per boarding are coming down because of the very strong growth in ridership and the nature of the cost structure negotiated with BNSF. The 2007 cost per revenue hour declined by 9% to $1,282.18, after declining 5% the previous year. The cost per boarding dropped 14.5% to $11.47. This was the fourth year in a row that this indicator showed a decline.

Sounder is projecting significant growth of 48% in trips operated in 2008 due to the agreement
with BNSF to add trains next year. While total costs will rise as service is added, the cost per
hour is projected to decline by 13% to $1,112. 68. It remains to be seen whether constraints in
parking capacity and feeder service on the south corridor will dampen the strong ridership
growth.

Tacoma Link. The Tacoma light rail service is operated by Sound Transit directly, unlike the
bus and commuter rail services which are contracted to other agencies. While operating hours of service remained flat in 2007, the operating costs went up 10% after only a modest increase the previous year. The cost per boarding was up 6% to $3.48. While Tacoma Link has a relatively small budget compared to the other services, the steep increase is a concern especially as this service is largely in Sound Transit’s control.

Over all, these operating statistics indicate that Sounder is in an excellent position with respect to its cost and productivity trends, however, Tacoma Link costs rose at an alarming rate in 2007 and ST Express continued to present ongoing challenges for the agency. We urge the Board to
monitor operating cost growth from year to year and ensure that staff are making realistic
assumptions about future increases. As COP has recommended in the past, we also recommend for ST Express that the Board consider other operating models than the current sole source
contracting arrangement with the three local providers. The expiration in 2009 of the current
contracts presents an opportunity to improve on the current situation and to obtain greater
certainty of costs and better control over cost growth.

The articles are posted solely for educational purposes to raise awareness of transportation issues. I claim no authorship, nor do I profit from this website. Where known, all original authors and/or source publisher have been noted in the post. As this is a knowledge base, rather than a blog, I have reproduced the articles in full to allow for complete reader understanding and allow for comprehensive text searching...see custom google search engine at the top of the page. If you have concerns about the inclusion of a specific article, please email bbdc1@live.com. for a speedy resolution.